Javascript är avstängt eller blockerat i din webbläsare. Detta kan leda till att vissa delar av vår webbplats inte fungerar som de ska. Sätt på javascript för optimal funktionalitet och utseende.

Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Sara

Sara Santesson

Universitetsadjunkt

Sara

Naturvetare skriver populärvetenskap

Författare

  • Susanne Pelger
  • Sara Santesson
  • Gunlög Josefsson

Summary, in English

One of the generic learning outcomes to be achieved by science students at Lund University is the ability to communicate science also to a non-specialist audience. In this report we analyze popular science papers written by undergraduate students of biology. The aim is to investigate the quality of the observed learning outcomes of a course in communicating with the general public. Through textual analysis we have studied four issues: how the papers are composed, how they appeal to the reader, how they are suited for the situation and for the reader, and how formally correct they are. The purpose of the report is to identify the strengths and the weaknesses of students’ popular writing. Our results show that the students generally succeed in writing a catching title and an interesting introduction, whereas the following parts in many cases tend to have a more scientific approach. It is obvious that the students are not familiar enough with the popular science genre. Besides a sometimes unreflected use of technical terms most students have difficulties in changing perspectives, and in arguing the importance and relevance of their findings. Based on our results we suggest a model for integrated communication training, where different tasks accompanied by feedback from fellow students or teachers, will help students to make progress in their communication skills. We discuss the relationship between scientific and popular science writing, and the potential of communication as a didactic tool. Our concluding remark is that communication is an underestimated vehicle for learning in the scientific disciplines, and that popular science writing would add significant value to the process of learning how to argue scientific claims.

Avdelning/ar

  • Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten
  • Avdelningen för svenskämnen, danska och isländska
  • Svenska

Publiceringsår

2009

Språk

Svenska

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Lärande Lund, rapport

Volym

2009:4

Dokumenttyp

Rapport

Förlag

Lärande Lund

Ämne

  • Languages and Literature

Nyckelord

  • SoTL
  • popular writing
  • popular science
  • communicative training

Status

Published

Report number

2009:4

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 1652-5752